- Home
- England
- Premier League
- Ipswich Town vs Bournemouth AFC
Match Information
Location
England
Stadium
Portman Road Stadium
Referee
Michael Salisbury
Match Summary
Match Preview
Match Preview: Ipswich Town vs Bournemouth AFC
Overview
Ipswich Town will face Bournemouth AFC at Portman Road Stadium on 8 December 2024. Ipswich, currently 19th in the Premier League standings, are seeking their first home win of the season. Bournemouth, sitting at 13th, aim to continue their ascent up the table after recent positive results.Both teams approach this fixture with different fortunes. Ipswich have secured only one victory in 14 matches, struggling to convert performances into points. Bournemouth have shown stronger form, winning five of their 13 games. This match presents an important opportunity for Ipswich to improve their standing, while Bournemouth will look to build on their momentum.
Team News
Ipswich Town manager Kieran McKenna faces selection challenges with several players managing injuries. Right-back Ben Johnson and midfielder Kalvin Phillips have returned to the squad but are not yet fully fit. Midfielder Jens Cajuste is being carefully managed due to minor knocks, making his involvement uncertain. Defenders Axel Tuanzebe and forward George Hirst remain sidelined with long-term injuries, and winger Chiedozie Ogbene's return date is unknown. These absences impact Ipswich's depth and physical profile.Bournemouth AFC will be without defender Marcos Senesi, who is likely absent until the new year due to a muscle injury. Right-back Julian Araujo is out with a hamstring issue, and midfielder Alex Scott is expected to return in late December after a meniscus injury. Winger Luis Sinisterra is doubtful with a muscle problem. Manager Andoni Iraola will need to adjust his lineup to account for these absences, particularly in defense.
Match Analysis
Ipswich Town have struggled this season, with one win in 14 matches and a goal difference of minus 12. They average 1 goal per game but concede 1.85, highlighting defensive challenges. Their home form has been concerning, as they have yet to secure a victory at Portman Road Stadium. The absence of key defenders like Axel Tuanzebe could further affect their defensive stability.Bournemouth AFC, in contrast, have shown stronger performances and sit 13th with 18 points. They score an average of 1.54 goals per game, demonstrating a more potent attack. Forward Antoine Semenyo has been influential, contributing four goals and averaging nearly two shots per game. Midfielder Justin Kluivert has also been a key player, although his participation is uncertain due to injury doubts.
Defensively, Bournemouth concede an average of 1.46 goals per game, indicating they can be breached. With Marcos Senesi potentially out, their defensive options are limited. Ipswich may look to exploit this weakness, though their own attacking output has been limited. Possession statistics show Ipswich averaging 41%, suggesting they might focus on counter-attacks. Bournemouth averages 45% possession, pointing to a potential midfield battle.
Discipline could play a role, as both teams average nearly three yellow cards per game. Maintaining composure will be important to avoid impacting the match through suspensions or red cards. The outcome may depend on which team can capitalize on opportunities and manage defensive lapses effectively.
Player Match Statistics
Player▼ | Position▼ | Goal▼ | Assist▼ | Mins▼ | Cards▼ | Shot▼ | SOT▼ | Blk▼ | WW▼ | Interc▼ | Tackl▼ | Pass▼ | PassAcc▼ | Drib▼ | DribSucc▼ | KeyPass▼ | Crs▼ | CrsAcc▼ | LngBall▼ | LngBallAcc▼ | Duel▼ | DuelWon▼ | Lost▼ | Foul▼ | Fouled▼ | Offs▼ | Saves▼ | Punches▼ | Run out▼ | Run outSucc▼ | HighClaim▼ | Rating▼ | Freekick▼ | Freekickgoal▼ | Fastbrk▼ | Fastbrkgoal▼ | Posslost ▼ | LongBall▼ | Long BallAcc ▼ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C Burgess | D | 0 | 1 | 90 | - | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 79% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 75% | 7 | 71% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 75% | ||
S Morsy | M | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 81% | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0 | 6 | 17% | 10 | 30% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 17% | |
A Murić | G | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 61% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 55% | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 29 | 55% | ||
B Johnson | D | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 73% | 2 | 100% | 0 | 1 | 0% | 6 | 0% | 7 | 57% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 6 | 0% |
S Szmodics | M | 0 | 0 | 80 | Y | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 94% | 2 | 50% | 0 | 5 | 40% | 2 | 100% | 12 | 42% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 100% |
J Clarke | F | 0 | 0 | 10 | - | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 57% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||||
J Taylor | M | 0 | 0 | 89 | - | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 41 | 78% | 2 | 50% | 3 | 0 | 6 | 17% | 7 | 71% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 17% | |
L Davis | D | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 83% | 1 | 0% | 2 | 2 | 50% | 2 | 100% | 5 | 60% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 100% |
C Chaplin | F | 1 | 0 | 90 | - | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 76% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 2 | 0% | 3 | 0% | 8 | 50% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 0% |
D O'Shea | D | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 53% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 48% | 8 | 88% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 25 | 48% | ||
L Delap | F | 0 | 0 | 81 | Y | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 55% | 3 | 67% | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0% | 22 | 45% | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 0% | |
O E Giraud-Hutchinson | M | 0 | 0 | 89 | - | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 78% | 2 | 50% | 1 | 2 | 50% | 1 | 0% | 11 | 36% | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 0% |
W Burns | F | 0 | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
J Cajuste | M | 0 | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0% | ||
A Al-Hamadi | F | 0 | 0 | 9 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 60% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 25% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Player▼ | Position▼ | Goal▼ | Assist▼ | Mins▼ | Cards▼ | Shot▼ | SOT▼ | Blk▼ | WW▼ | Interc▼ | Tackl▼ | Pass▼ | PassAcc▼ | Drib▼ | DribSucc▼ | KeyPass▼ | Crs▼ | CrsAcc▼ | LngBall▼ | LngBallAcc▼ | Duel▼ | DuelWon▼ | Lost▼ | Foul▼ | Fouled▼ | Offs▼ | Saves▼ | Punches▼ | Run out▼ | Run outSucc▼ | HighClaim▼ | Rating▼ | Freekick▼ | Freekickgoal▼ | Fastbrk▼ | Fastbrkgoal▼ | Posslost ▼ | LongBall▼ | Long BallAcc ▼ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D Ouattara | F | 1 | 1 | 27 | - | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 83% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0% | |
E Ünal | F | 1 | 0 | 27 | - | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 83% | 1 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 40% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
K Arrizabalaga | G | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 60% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 36% | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 14 | 36% | ||
I Zabarnyi | D | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 45 | 82% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 9 | 11% | 17 | 82% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 9 | 11% |
P Billing | M | 0 | 0 | 16 | - | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 100% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 4 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 100% | |
R Christie | F | 0 | 0 | 86 | - | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 80% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0 | 10 | 30% | 7 | 29% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 30% | |
M Kerkez | D | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 41 | 83% | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0% | 12 | 58% | 7 | 86% | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 58% | |
L Cook | M | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 53 | 87% | 2 | 50% | 1 | 6 | 17% | 8 | 62% | 12 | 50% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 8 | 62% |
D Brooks | M | 0 | 0 | 16 | Y | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 70% | 2 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 25% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |||
J Hill | D | 0 | 0 | 4 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 25% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | ||||
D Huijsen | D | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 67 | 90% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 18 | 67% | 6 | 0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 18 | 67% | |
Evanilson | F | 0 | 0 | 74 | - | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 44% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 25% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | ||||
M Tavernier | M | 0 | 0 | 74 | - | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 37 | 86% | 2 | 0% | 1 | 2 | 0% | 2 | 50% | 8 | 12% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 50% |
J Kluivert | F | 0 | 0 | 63 | - | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 67% | 1 | 0% | 3 | 4 | 25% | 2 | 100% | 3 | 33% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 100% |
A Smith | D | 0 | 0 | 63 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 93% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 2 | 50% | 6 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 50% | |
A Semenyo | F | 0 | 0 | 90 | - | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 32 | 62% | 8 | 75% | 2 | 1 | 100% | 4 | 0% | 23 | 48% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 4 | 0% |
Statistics
Match History
Recommended Bets
Back Under 2.5 Goals at 2.17 Odds
Ipswich Town face Bournemouth AFC in a match where a low-scoring outcome appears likely. Ipswich have struggled offensively this season, averaging one goal per game. At home, their scoring record dips further, with only five goals in seven matches, approximately 0.71 goals per game. Their recent fixtures highlight this trend, with their last two home games ending in 1-0 defeats against Crystal Palace and Nottingham Forest. These results underscore their difficulties in breaking down defences and converting possession into clear chances.Defensively, Ipswich have shown resilience, particularly against stronger opponents. Their 1-1 draw with Manchester United demonstrated their ability to contain potent attacks. Bournemouth's visiting side averages 1.54 goals per game but may find it challenging to penetrate Ipswich's organised defence. Moreover, Bournemouth's away matches have seen them score 11 goals in seven games, but they have also faced teams with more open styles of play compared to Ipswich's disciplined approach.
Bournemouth's recent 1-0 defeat to Leicester City and 1-1 draw with Aston Villa indicate a potential for lower-scoring matches when facing teams with solid defensive structures. Ipswich's necessity to secure points may lead them to prioritise defensive stability over attacking expansiveness. Considering these factors, backing under 2.5 goals at 2.17 odds presents a plausible outcome.
Ipswich Town to Triumph at 3.75 Odds
Despite their position near the bottom of the table, Ipswich Town have shown signs of improvement and resilience that could lead to a victory against Bournemouth. Their historic 2-1 win over Tottenham Hotspur highlighted their capacity to upset stronger teams through tactical discipline and effective counter-attacks. Playing at Portman Road Stadium, Ipswich will be motivated to secure their first home win of the season.Bournemouth's defensive vulnerabilities offer Ipswich an opportunity. Bournemouth concede an average of 1.46 goals per game and have shown inconsistency, with recent losses to Brentford and Leicester City. Their potential absence of key defender Marcos Senesi due to injury may further weaken their backline. Ipswich's forward Liam Delap, who has scored six goals this season, can exploit these weaknesses.
Additionally, Bournemouth's inconsistency on the road, with three losses in seven away games, suggests they are not invincible away from home. Ipswich's need for points and the encouragement from previous strong performances may provide the impetus for a home victory. At odds of 3.75, backing Ipswich Town to win offers value considering the circumstances surrounding the match.
Liam Delap to Find the Net at 3.45 Odds
Liam Delap has been a bright spot in Ipswich Town's challenging season. With six goals to his name, he averages 0.56 goals per 90 minutes, making him the team's leading scorer. His involvement is significant, featuring in all 13 games and playing approximately 73 minutes per match. Delap's ability to find space and his finishing skills are crucial to Ipswich's attacking efforts.Facing a Bournemouth defence that concedes 1.46 goals per game and potentially missing Marcos Senesi, Delap has an opportunity to add to his tally. Bournemouth have shown defensive lapses in recent matches, conceding multiple goals against teams with proactive forwards. Delap's physical presence and work rate can unsettle Bournemouth's backline, especially if they are restructured due to injuries.
Moreover, Ipswich's strategy may focus on utilising Delap's strengths, aiming to supply him with opportunities through set-pieces and counter-attacks. His previous performances against strong teams indicate he can deliver when chances arise. At odds of 3.45, backing Liam Delap to score anytime is a reasonable proposition given his form and the defensive issues facing Bournemouth.
Bet Builder: Under 2.5 Goals, Ipswich Town to Win, Liam Delap to Score Anytime @ 28.07 Odds
Combining the three selections into a Bet Builder offers a substantial potential return. With odds of 28.07, a £10 bet could return £280.70. This bet hinges on a low-scoring match where Ipswich Town secure a victory, and Liam Delap contributes with a goal. The synergy between these outcomes is plausible based on the teams' statistics and recent performances.Lineup
Latest News